Heads up! First things first:
FeenoX is not a traditional point-and-click finite-element solver. It does not include a graphical interface.
FeenoX is designed as a cloud-first back end for generic computational workflows to solve engineering-related problems. One of these many workflows can be point-and-click graphical interface such as CAEplex which allows to solve thermo-mechanical problems directly from the browser.
Since it is a cloud-first tool, FeenoX targets at GNU/Linux. If you are using Windows, FeenoX may not be for you (but CAEplex may). See below to find out why FeenoX works the way it does.
In plain engineering terms, FeenoX works like a transfer function between one or more input files and zero or more output files:
+------------+
mesh (*.msh) } | | { terminal
data (*.dat) } input ----> | FeenoX |----> output { data files
input (*.fee) } | | { post (vtk/msh)
+------------+
When solving problems using the finite element method, FeenoX sits in the middle of pre and post-processing tools. The former should aid the engineer to prepare the mesh and, eventually, the input file. The latter should show the numerical results. See the tensile test tutorial for an in-depth step-by-step explanation.
To fix ideas, let us consider the NAFEMS LE10
“Thick plate pressure” benchmark. Fig. 1 shows that there is a
one-to-one correspondence between the human-friendly problem formulation
and the input file FeenoX reads. There is no need to give extra settings
if the problem does not ask for them. Note that since the problem has
only one volume, E
means “the” Young modulus. No need to
deal with a map between materials and mesh entitites (in this case the
mapping is not needed but in multi-material
problems the mapping is needed indeed). Nothing more, nothing
less.
Say we already have a nafems-le10.geo
file which tells Gmsh how to create a
mesh nafems-le10.msh
(check out the tensile
test tutorial for details). Then, we can create an input file for
FeenoX (using editors
with syntax highlighting for example) as follows:
# NAFEMS Benchmark LE-10: thick plate pressure
PROBLEM mechanical DIMENSIONS 3
READ_MESH nafems-le10.msh # mesh in millimeters
# LOADING: uniform normal pressure on the upper surface
BC upper p=1 # 1 Mpa
# BOUNDARY CONDITIONS:
BC DCD'C' v=0 # Face DCD'C' zero y-displacement
BC ABA'B' u=0 # Face ABA'B' zero x-displacement
BC BCB'C' u=0 v=0 # Face BCB'C' x and y displ. fixed
BC midplane w=0 # z displacements fixed along mid-plane
# MATERIAL PROPERTIES: isotropic single-material properties
E = 210e3 # Young modulus in MPa
nu = 0.3 # Poisson's ratio
SOLVE_PROBLEM # solve!
# print the direct stress y at D (and nothing more)
PRINT "σ_y @ D = " sigmay(2000,0,300) "MPa"
Heads up! The
.msh
file from Gmsh can be either
- version 2.2, or
- version 4.0, or
- version 4.1.
and can be partitioned or not.
Once we put these two files, nafems-le10.geo
and
nafems-le10.fee
in the same directory, say in the examples
directory of the repository, then we call first Gmsh and then FeenoX
from the terminal to solve the benchmark problem:
Check out the section about invocation in the FeenoX manual.
The trick is that this workflow is susceptible of being automated and customized to run in the cloud, possibly in parallel throughout several servers using the MPI standard. Check out this 1-minute video that covers a similar case from the tensile-test tutorial:
There is a sound explanation about why FeenoX works this way and not like other FEA tools you might have encountered in the past. If you are feeling curious, take a look at what FeenoX has to offer to hackers and academics.
FeenoX can solve the following types of problems:
Take the tutorials to learn how to solve those types of problems:
Browse through the documentation to dive deeper into the details.
There are two “why” questions we have to answer.
Why is FeenoX different from other “similar” tools?
Consider again the NAFEMS LE10 case from fig. 1 above. Take some time to think (or investigate) how other FEA tools handle this case. Note the following features FeenoX provides:
Why FeenoX works the way it does?
Because it is cloud first and its objective is to be flexible enough to power web-based interfaces like CAEplex and many other workflows. More information in the details for Unix experts and academic professors.
Depending on the complexity of the case, CAEplex might be enough or not. If the latter, one has to see what’s sitting under the hood. Peek into the documentation and the repository for further details.
Here is a 5-min explanation of why it works this way, and why it is not expected to run in Windows (although it can run in Windows if you try hard enough, but it is not worth it):